Implicit User Feedback and User Search Behaviour – Lesson Preview
This lesson tackles a hotly debated question in SEO: how much does user behaviour influence rankings? You’ll learn what Google calls “implicit feedback”, the signals created when people search, click, scroll, hover, and reformulate queries, and how those interactions can be used to rank and re-rank results.
Lazarina walks through what patentsreveal about signals like dwell time, long clicks, pogo-sticking, mouse-hover, and SERP interactions, plus how device (mobile vs. desktop) and location nuance what users see.
You’ll also see why much industry coverage can be misleading, and how to ground your own decisions in observable data. Because we can’t access Google’s internal metrics, the lesson shows how to reverse-engineer intent and satisfaction by pairing Search Console queries with GA4 engagement data and by using Clarity to find friction points.
You’ll leave with a pragmatic workflow to spot patterns, compare mobile vs. desktop behaviour, and identify where UX improvements can move both engagement and rankings.
What you’ll learn (why it matters)
- Spot implicit feedback signals, because they inform ranking and re-ranking.
- Blend GSC + GA4 data, because joined datasets reveal satisfaction gaps.
- Audit mobile vs. desktop intent, because device behaviour changes result ordering.
- Use Clarity for UX issues, because fixing friction boosts engagement metrics.
- Track ranking volatility, because it can indicate re-ranking experiments.
- Assess entity-level engagement, because topics and sentiment shape on-page success.
Key concepts (with mini-definitions)
- Implicit user feedback — behavioural signals (clicks, dwell, scrolls) used to assess relevance.
- Dwell time / long click — time on a result before returning; proxy for satisfaction.
- Pogo-sticking — bouncing between SERP and results; signals mismatch or low quality.
- Browsing time factor — patent-described metric using time-on-page to weight relevance.
- Rank modifier engine — tracking component that adjusts rankings based on interactions.
- SERP interactions — actions on results pages (click, hover, scroll) used to refine order.
- Query reformulation — subsequent queries after a click indicating prior result quality.
- Device-specific ranking — different ordering by mobile vs. desktop based on behaviour patterns.
Tools mentioned
Google Search Console, GA4, Microsoft Clarity and Looker Studio.
Practice & readings
- Join GSC query URLs to GA4 landing pages in Looker Studio; analyse engagement by query.
- Compare mobile vs. desktop: query length, average click position, landing pages.
- Review Microsoft Clarity heatmaps/session recordings; fix dead/rage clicks.
- Suggested reading: patents and resources linked in the lesson slides; Celeste Gonzalez’s Microsoft Clarity article and work on Wix SEO Learning Hub.
Key insights & takeaways
- Google has long patented systems that incorporate user behaviour into relevance.
- Industry reporting can understate behavioural data; verify claims against primary sources.
- Chrome and SERP interactions provide rich behaviour signals referenced in filings/patents.
- Google aims to lean more on ML (e.g., BERT/MUM) but still uses behaviour today.
- You can’t mirror Google’s data, but you can triangulate with GSC, GA4, and Clarity to act.
Ready for the next step? Start your learning journey with MLforSEO
Buy the course to unlock the full lesson
See how behaviour insights translate directly into ranking power!