Comparative Analysis of NLP APIs versus generative AI on entity extraction – Lesson Preview
Entity analysis powers core SEO work: content audits, query analysis, internal linking and review mining. This lesson shows why task-specific NLP APIs consistently outperform chatbots for entity extraction and semantic analysis. You’ll see a head-to-head comparison using the same text and prompts across Google Cloud Natural Language API, Amazon Comprehend, IBM Watson NLU, and popular generative models (ChatGPT, Gemini, DeepSeek, Qwen).
We walk through what each approach returns (entities, types, sentiment, mentions, metadata, relationships) and where generative AI falls short for scalable, repeatable analysis. You’ll learn how differences in model training and feature sets affect results, e.g., why Google Cloud reports more entities, why AWS splits “key phrases” from entities, and how IBM adds emotion and relationship mapping. The lesson closes with guidance on open-source alternatives (spaCy, NLTK, Transformers) and when to prefer cloud APIs for accuracy, speed, and integration.
What you’ll learn (why it matters)
- Choose the right extractor because APIs return richer, reliable entity data.
- Interpret API outputs because types, sentiment, mentions, and metadata drive SEO actions.
- Compare vendors on your data because feature sets (e.g., keyphrases vs entities) change outcomes.
- Avoid GenAI pitfalls because results vary, can hallucinate, and aren’t easily scalable.
- Validate sentiment results because models match human labels only ~43% of the time.
Key concepts (with mini-definitions)
- Entity extraction — identifying people, orgs, products, and concepts in text.
- Entity sentiment — sentiment tied to a specific entity (not whole document).
- Document sentiment — overall positive/negative/neutral tone of a text.
- Keyphrase extraction — important multi-word terms; in AWS may differ from “entities.”
- Entity relationships — how entities connect in text (e.g., brand → feature).
- Metadata (KG/Wikipedia) — external IDs/links that enrich entities for analysis.
- Syntax/semantic roles — structure that clarifies who did what to whom.
- Scalability & determinism — process large corpora with repeatable outputs.
Tools mentioned
Google Cloud Natural Language API, Amazon Comprehend, IBM Watson NLU, ChatGPT, Google Gemini, DeepSeek R1, Alibaba Qwen (Qwen 2.5+), spaCy, NLTK, Stanford NLP, Hugging Face Transformers, BERT, DistilBERT, Vertex AI, BigQuery, Google Sheets (no-code template), Google Colab (demo notebook) and AWS Console (demo).
Practice & readings
- Use the ML for SEO no-code template to extract entities with Google Cloud.
- Run the provided IBM Watson NLU demo notebook; export entities and relationships.
- Try AWS Comprehend’s console demo, then download the CSV and compare to Google Cloud.
Key insights & takeaways
- Google Cloud NLP is the top performer in the test; DeepSeek leads GenAI—but GenAI still isn’t recommended.
- NLP APIs beat chatbots on coverage, structure, repeatability, and speed.
- Vendor feature differences (e.g., AWS keyphrases vs Google entities) materially affect results.
- Sentiment models need manual review; expect ~43% agreement with human labels.
- Always trial multiple APIs on your own dataset before standardizing.
Ready for the next step? Start your learning journey with MLforSEO
Buy the course to unlock the full lesson
Make confident, scalable entity analysis part of your SEO and marketing workflow.