AI Search & LLMs: Entity SEO and Knowledge Graph Strategies for Brands

Bonus Lesson – Comparative Analysis of NLP APIs versus generative AI on entity extraction

This is a preview lesson

Purchase this course, or sign in if you’re already enrolled, to take this lesson.

Lesson Transcript



      What’s Covered in This Lesson

      • Comparative analysis of NLP APIs vs. Generative AI for entity extraction
      • Overview of major NLP APIs: Google Cloud Natural Language, AWS Comprehend, IBM Watson NLU
      • Testing of Generative AI models: ChatGPT, Gemini, DeepSeek, Qwen
      • Experiment methodology and results comparison
      • Reasons why task-specific ML APIs outperform Generative AI
      • Sentiment analysis comparison across platforms
      • Free (open-source) vs. paid (cloud-based) entity extraction solutions
      • Practical demonstrations of no-code templates and implementation

      Key Takeaways

      • Experiment Winner: Google Cloud NLP API extracted 70 entities (59 unique) – significantly outperforming all other options
      • GenAI Performance Rankings:
        • DeepSeek R1: 38 entities (best GenAI performer)
        • Qwen: 25 entities
        • ChatGPT: 14 entities
        • Gemini: 0 entities (failed to extract any)
      • Why NLP APIs Beat GenAI:
        • More robust data with entity types, mentions, metadata, relationships
        • Consistent, repeatable results (GenAI varies each time)
        • Trained specifically for entity extraction, not text generation
        • Faster processing and better scalability
        • Structured output for further analysis
        • No hallucinations or false entities
      • API Differences Matter:
        • Google Cloud: Strongest entity extraction, includes content moderation
        • AWS Comprehend: Unique keyword/keyphrase extraction module, strong free tier ($100-200 credits)
        • IBM Watson NLU: Entity relationships mapping, emotion extraction (joy, anger, sadness)
        • Some entities in Google are “Other” type, while AWS/IBM classify them as keywords instead
      • Additional NLP API Benefits: Entity sentiment, salience scores, Wikipedia links, Knowledge Graph IDs, mention variations, syntax analysis, text classification
      • Sentiment Analysis Findings: AWS and Google excel at positive/negative detection; IBM better at identifying neutrality; all three matched human labels only 43% of the time – manual review still needed
      • GenAI for Sentiment Analysis: Not recommended – poor out-of-box performance, impractical for scale, questionable results even with extensive prompting
      • Cost Considerations: Cloud APIs often surprisingly affordable for massive data volumes – always run cost calculations before dismissing
      • Free Alternatives: spaCy, NLTK, Stanford NLP, Hugging Face Transformers – better for privacy-sensitive projects, customization, or tight budgets
      • Cloud vs. Open-Source Trade-offs:
        • Cloud: Instant plug-and-play, advanced features, scalability, easy BigQuery integration
        • Open-source: Data privacy control, customization for specialized domains (legal, medical), no API costs
      • Critical Lesson: Use tools designed for the specific task – GenAI excels at content transformation and Q&A, but NLP APIs are purpose-built for text analysis at scale

      Comparative Analysis of NLP APIs versus generative AI on entity extraction – Lesson Preview

      Entity analysis powers core SEO work: content audits, query analysis, internal linking and review mining. This lesson shows why task-specific NLP APIs consistently outperform chatbots for entity extraction and semantic analysis. You’ll see a head-to-head comparison using the same text and prompts across Google Cloud Natural Language API, Amazon Comprehend, IBM Watson NLU, and popular generative models (ChatGPT, Gemini, DeepSeek, Qwen).

      We walk through what each approach returns (entities, types, sentiment, mentions, metadata, relationships) and where generative AI falls short for scalable, repeatable analysis. You’ll learn how differences in model training and feature sets affect results, e.g., why Google Cloud reports more entities, why AWS splits “key phrases” from entities, and how IBM adds emotion and relationship mapping. The lesson closes with guidance on open-source alternatives (spaCy, NLTK, Transformers) and when to prefer cloud APIs for accuracy, speed, and integration.


      What you’ll learn (why it matters)

      • Choose the right extractor because APIs return richer, reliable entity data.
      • Interpret API outputs because types, sentiment, mentions, and metadata drive SEO actions.
      • Compare vendors on your data because feature sets (e.g., keyphrases vs entities) change outcomes.
      • Avoid GenAI pitfalls because results vary, can hallucinate, and aren’t easily scalable.
      • Validate sentiment results because models match human labels only ~43% of the time.

      Key concepts (with mini-definitions)

      • Entity extraction — identifying people, orgs, products, and concepts in text.
      • Entity sentiment — sentiment tied to a specific entity (not whole document).
      • Document sentiment — overall positive/negative/neutral tone of a text.
      • Keyphrase extraction — important multi-word terms; in AWS may differ from “entities.”
      • Entity relationships — how entities connect in text (e.g., brand → feature).
      • Metadata (KG/Wikipedia) — external IDs/links that enrich entities for analysis.
      • Syntax/semantic roles — structure that clarifies who did what to whom.
      • Scalability & determinism — process large corpora with repeatable outputs.

      Tools mentioned

      Google Cloud Natural Language API, Amazon Comprehend, IBM Watson NLU, ChatGPT, Google Gemini, DeepSeek R1, Alibaba Qwen (Qwen 2.5+), spaCy, NLTK, Stanford NLP, Hugging Face Transformers, BERT, DistilBERT, Vertex AI, BigQuery, Google Sheets (no-code template), Google Colab (demo notebook) and AWS Console (demo).


      Practice & readings

      • Use the ML for SEO no-code template to extract entities with Google Cloud.
      • Run the provided IBM Watson NLU demo notebook; export entities and relationships.
      • Try AWS Comprehend’s console demo, then download the CSV and compare to Google Cloud.

      Key insights & takeaways

      • Google Cloud NLP is the top performer in the test; DeepSeek leads GenAI—but GenAI still isn’t recommended.
      • NLP APIs beat chatbots on coverage, structure, repeatability, and speed.
      • Vendor feature differences (e.g., AWS keyphrases vs Google entities) materially affect results.
      • Sentiment models need manual review; expect ~43% agreement with human labels.
      • Always trial multiple APIs on your own dataset before standardizing.

      Ready for the next step? Start your learning journey with MLforSEO

      Buy the course to unlock the full lesson
      Make confident, scalable entity analysis part of your SEO and marketing workflow.

      Length: 32 minutes|Difficulty: Standard
      0 of 51 lessons complete (0%)